Penang south fishermen's future lies in the prospect of reclamation project – A response to The Asean Post’s article on Penang South Reclamation scheme

-
A recent article about Penang’s marine life in The Asean Post has given wrong impression about a reclamation proposal and the fisheries condition in the State. (‘Penang’s new islands will kill marine life,’ 23 June 2019)

I would like to provide facts to correct the article’s misleading portrayal of the matter.

Exaggeration of fishermen’s plight

The article states that “The proposed area for the artificial islands is currently the place where most fishermen around the state coastline live and work. Objections have come from this group of fishermen whose livelihoods and villages are threatened most by this project.” (Emphasis added)

This is wrong as the number of fishermen living in Barat Daya district, where the reclamation site is located, is 912 out of 2,905 registered fishermen in Penang. That means most of the fishermen are living at other coastline in the State, not at the reclamation site.

Besides exaggerating the number of fishermen staying near the reclamation site, the article also exaggerates their objections. More than 50 percent of the fishermen staying there actually support the reclamation project.

The approving voices of the fishermen who support the project is surprisingly neglected in the article.

Ignoring actual threat to marine life

The article’s single-minded criticism of the future threat to the marine life is absolutely blinded to the fact that marine life in the area is already depleting due to overfishing, even before a single grain of sand is dropped into the sea for reclamation.

Fisheries Department director-general Datuk Munir Mohd Nawi had acknowledged this matter late last year, that the depletion of fishes was due to overfishing. Of the 7,800 marine species around the world, 90 percent were fully fished or overfished.

In Penang, the destruction of sea bed at the reclamation site has been happening due to overfishing through destructive fishing method such as the usage of coastal seine nets locally known as ‘pukat tunda.’

Overfishing in Penang was so critical that in 2015 the fisheries department had to restrict the issuance of licence to fishing vessels, reducing them by 30 percent. This happened before any reclamation took place.  

Who caused overfishing? It was the fishermen. Definitely not the reclamation as the project hasn’t even started.

The Asean Post’s article highlighted the concern for marine life and livelihood of the fishermen while blinded to the fact that it was the latter that had destroyed the former, and conveniently blamed a reclamation proposal that hasn’t even begin.

Future of Penang south

The future of the southern part of Penang is in the successful implementation of the Penang South Reclamation scheme (PSR).

The project will create jobs for the fishermen in the overfished area. The two stakeholders’ engagement centres (‘Pusat Perkhidmatan Setempat Nelayan’) set up in the fishermen’s villages are already registering fishermen for jobs.

The PSR will also rejuvenate marine life in the destroyed sea bed through the installation of artificial reefs and eco-engineering, which is a proven mitigation method.

These and other effective action plans were already made public during the month-long display of the Environmental Impact Assessment report. Anyone who cares enough to write an article about these concerns related to the project shouldn’t have missed the executive summary.

The development on the reclaimed islands will expand the economic opportunities for the fishermen, improving their social mobility. The future of the southern fishermen lies in the prospect of the reclamation project.

Popular posts from this blog

BRT expert sweet-talking Penang to install bus system?

-
Image
It was reported that Yoga Adiwinarto, country director of the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) in Jakarta had recommended the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system for Penang in a presentation organised by Think City yesterday. The ITDP specialises in BRT and their institutional mission is to promote the bus system around the world in that their “specific area of expertise is the bus rapid transit (BRT) and we work to spread knowledge about BRT and provide high-level technical assistance to cities pursuing BRT projects in the US and abroad.” Urban planning expert, Diego Silva Ardila has observed that think-tanks like ITDP “have focused on BRT systems as the only plausible solution for urban transport in the developing world, and have not seriously and rigorously analysed the possibilities that rail-based systems have [...]” Ardila further noted that “the think-tanks and their claims have been deemed biased by the fact that they represented the interests of ...
Read more

Jobs don't drop from the sky #5

-
Image
I will continue to write about real Penangites whose life has been changed for the better because of Penang South Reclamation (PSR). These Penangites are not big-name politicians, their story seldom gets highlighted. Nonetheless, they are Penangites who can now earn a decent living for their family due to the project. Therefore, I think their story deserved to be told. Pak Idris and his grandson, Adam are such Penangites. Idris, 66 years old, has worked as a fisherman for over five decades. Adam, now 23, had been helping his grandpa since his teens. Adam shared about an incident when he was 18 years old working in the sea with his grandpa. That day they met with a thunderstorm. Huge waves were hitting their boat. Idris used all his strength to steer the boat to safety, against the strong currents until the vessel almost broke into two. “Tok perlu lawan sampai bot terangkat tinggi, hampir patah dua." Adam said. “Masa tu, kalau hanyut di laut, pun hanyut lah,” Idris added. Fortunate...
Read more

Mindless urging for Penang’s return to Kedah

-
Image
The three treaties archived in ‘ A Collection of Treaties and Engagements with the Native Princes and States of Asia Concluded on Behalf of the East India Company by the British Governments in India ’, published in 1812 are: Agreement with the King of Queda for the Cession of Prince of Wales Island in 1786. Treaty of Peace with King of Queda and for an annual Quit-rent for Prince of Wales' Island in 1791. Treaty with the King of Queda for Cession of Territory on the Coast of Queda, in November 1802. These treaties were written and agreed upon under a very different legal and political setting from ours. Back then was colonial and monarchical era, while we are now living in a modern democratic nation-state. Back then, Penang and Kedah formed one country, as read in the 1791 treaty: “These nine articles are settled and concluded, and peace is made between Empetuan [sultan] and the English Company, Queda [Kedah] and Pooloo Pinang [Penang] shall be as one country.” Back then...
Read more